Pragmatic Reasoning Schema Theory
ثبت نشده
چکیده
according to utility theory, people should not allow the _____ of a choice to affect people seem not to have pragmatic reasoning schemata that apply. ical evidence for pragmatic reasoning schema theory comes from performance ory, pragmatic reasoning schemas are abstracted from everyday experience. parts of Cheng and Holyoak's pragmatic reasoning schemas are those about people. However, Cosmides' theory can't be the whole story, since we have no.
منابع مشابه
Pragmatic Reasoning With a Point of View
Cheng and Holyoak (1985) proposed that realistic reasoning in deontic contexts is based on pragmatic schemas such as those for assessing compliance with or violation of permission and obligation rules, and that the evocation of these schemas can facilitate performance in Wason's (1966) selection task. A number of investigators have since obtained evidence that the dominant pattern of selections...
متن کاملDomain-specific reasoning: social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.
What counts as human rationality: reasoning processes that embody content-independent formal theories, such as propositional logic, or reasoning processes that are well designed for solving important adaptive problems? Most theories of human reasoning have been based on content-independent formal rationality, whereas adaptive reasoning, ecological or evolutionary, has been little explored. We e...
متن کاملPragmatic reasoning schemas.
We propose that people typically reason about realistic situations using neither content-free syntactic inference rules nor representations of specific experiences. Rather, people reason using knowledge structures that we term pragmatic reasoning schemas, which are generalized sets of rules defined in relation to classes of goals. Three experiments examined the impact of a “permission schema” o...
متن کاملNon-monotonic set theory as a pragmatic foundation of mathematics∗
In this paper I propose a new approach to the foundation of mathematics: non-monotonic set theory. I present two completely different methods to develop set theories based on adaptive logics. For both theories there is a finitistic non-triviality proof and both theories contain (a subtle version of) the comprehension axiom schema. The first theory contains only a maximal selection of instances ...
متن کاملPragmatic Reasoning A model-based theory
Deductive reasoning, or semantic reasoning, is concerned with what follows from a given set of premises regardless of the context in which they occur. By contrast, pragmatic reasoning is concerned with what follows from the premises in a given context. While pragmatic reasoning is typically much easier than semantic reasoning, proof-theoretic formalisations, in the form of nonmonotonic logics, ...
متن کامل